Facundo Mena vs Felipe Meligeni Alves Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L L W L L L
Form
W W W L L W W W W WHead To Head: Mena 1 - 1 Alves
They have played 5 sets in total, with Mena winning 2 and Alves winning 3. The last match between Mena and Alves was at the Piracicaba Challenger, 29-01-2025, First, Clay with Facundo Mena getting the victory 4-6 7-6(1) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Facundo Mena | 1 |
| Felipe Meligeni Alves | 1 |
Piracicaba Challenger(29-01-2025)
4
6
7
6
6
2
| Mena | Stats | Alves |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (6-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (15-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 190 | Ranking | 117 |
| 127 | Highest Rank | 117 |
| 32 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 9 |
| 57% (499-376) | Career Total W/L | 60% (331-223) |
| $140,110 | Career Prize Money | $486,670 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Darderi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 |
Stats 
Facundo Mena
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
53%
(
50 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 7-6(0) 6-2 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Facundo Mena
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
40%
(
30 of
75)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 25 | Games Won | 27 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:0:36 | Average Match Time | 2:0:36 |
| 47% (80/170) | 1st Serve % | 61% (94/153) |
| 64% (51/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (66/94) |
| 52% (47/90) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (32/59) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (7/20) |
| 36% (55/153) | Return Points Win % | 42% (72/170) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Facundo Mena
77%
(
76 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Maximus Jones
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Facundo Mena
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Facundo Mena
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Facundo Mena
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Facundo Mena
61%
(
78 of
128)
1st Serve %
56%
(
80 of
142)
4
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
1
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
56 of
80)
60%
(
30 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
51 of
142)
138
Total Points Won
132
|
7-6(8) 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Hugo Dellien
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Federico Coria
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
14
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Felipe Meligeni Alves Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Luka Pavlovic
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
1
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
7
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
99)
6
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Alfredo Perez
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Darwin Blanch
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
51%
(
58 of
114)
8
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
10
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
48%
(
39 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Alexis Galarneau
63%
(
59 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
47 of
58)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Cristian Garin
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
99)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (499/376) | Win/Loss | 60% (331/223) |
| 55% (1100/892) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (737/528) |
| 52% (9552/8975) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6289/5642) |
| 56% (70/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (34/37) |
| 57% (424/318) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (289/178) |
| 67% (4/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 50% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2549 | Aces Total | 1246 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1468 | Total Double Faults | 731 |
| 1:2:10 | Average Match Time | 1:23:43 |
| 507.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 387.5 |
| 55% (20129/36924) | 1st Serve % | 67% (21716/32212) |
| 70% (14151/20129) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (14412/21716) |
| 50% (8462/16795) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5350/10497) |
| 43% (1692/3909) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1380/3219) |
| 41% (15472/37912) | Return Points Win % | 40% (12853/32296) |
| 29% (4/10) | Slam W/L | 54% (19/16) |
| 0% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 38% (5/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 26% (5/14) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (17/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (179/167) | Challenger W/L | 57% (137/102) |
| 63% (311/183) | Futures W/L | 66% (152/77) |
| 57% (495/868) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (324/538) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 57% (150/261) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (100/172) |
| 57% (142/247) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (80/153) |
| 88% (471/413) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (334/281) |
| 12% (471/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (334/52) |
| 21% (404/85) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (220/48) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
